Using macro signals for equity investing

Investing in the equity market can seem daunting, particularly to those of us who are risk averse and worried over a lack of finance knowledge. However, history tells us that market performance can be anticipated by following macroeconomic signals and paying attention to the political and geopolitical changes in the economy.

Following the financial crisis in 2007-08, the global economy witnessed a recession where growth collapsed, interest rates were slashed and inflation was subdued. Despite the gloomy atmosphere, some stocks performed better than others given their defensive quality. Think discount stores and medical services providers that benefit from demand inelasticity. You need these goods, recession or not. Or recall India between 2010-11, when consumer price inflation rose to double digits. With input prices shooting up and hurting profit margins, commodity, industrial and bank stocks did reasonably well. These examples suggest that you can (and should) pick stocks or themes based on the macro environment.

Hard core finance professionals rely on bottom-up company analysis to select companies with good balance sheets, cash flow and rising profitability. However, bottom-up stock analysis is time consuming and arcane for individuals outside the field of finance. On the other hand, keeping track of economic changes through the news and the power of observation is more relatable. Macroeconomics can help you pick and choose investment themes and the companies that fit them. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are widely available in the market and investors can access the companies within the ETF index, its investment style and historical performance. Finding the right ETF suitable to the current economic environment is relatively simple given the information available today at your fingertips.

In addition to macroeconomics, geopolitical and regulatory changes also influence stock prices. Think US-China trade war that disproportionately hurt US automakers, chip makers and electronics manufacturers. Or the regulatory crackdown in China in 2021 which hammered Chinese tech companies. Following these developments and their impact could have guided you on where NOT to invest!

Let's take a look at the different macroeconomic scenarios and the sectors that outperform and underperform in them, to assist you in your investment journey.

High growth: Periods of economic boom are ripe for equity investing given strong consumer spending, corporate optimism and credit disbursal to fund unique business ideas. In order to select the sector or company that can generate high returns, turn to the details of GDP growth in that country. What is driving growth? Is it the consumption boom? If so, what are consumers spending on? Is it corporate investment into R&D, machinery or factories? Export boom led by specific products? Think semiconductors in Korea and Taiwan, electronics in Singapore and automobiles in Japan. The details help spot the growth generating sectors and investment themes that could give you your next big investment.

A study conducted by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI, provider of equity indices such as MSCI World, MSCI Emerging Markets among others) showed that industrials, consumer discretionary, financials and informational technology are the most cyclical sectors. This implies that companies within these sectors closely follow the business cycle. On the other hand, consumer staples, healthcare and utilities are the most defensive i.e., least correlated with growth and the economy.

High inflation: MSCI's research shows that high inflation lowers future growth and adversely impacts small cap companies in the medium term. Higher inflation could also take away from sectors that depend on stable cash flow over the long term such as utilities. On the other hand, sectors that act as effective inflation hedges including energy (through rising commodity prices), financials (through higher central bank policy rates that lift banks' interest income) and real estate investment trusts (REITs own real estate assets which benefit from rising rent and property prices during periods of inflation), outperform.

Emerging market equities have historically performed well during inflationary periods given the dominance of the commodity sector in their economies and / or export baskets. Examples include oil and gas in the Middle East, soybean, crude oil in Brazil, copper in Peru, petroleum, coal and coffee in Colombia and oil and gas in Indonesia.

MSCI Emerging Market Index (MXEF) vs Commodity Research Bureau Index (CRB RIND)

Extracted from 'Emerging market equities in an inflationary environment', Man Institute, August 2021

High interest rates: A high interest rate environment usually arises during periods of growth and / or inflation boom, when the central bank tightens liquidity conditions to prevent excesses. The central bank hikes the policy rate, thereby raising borrowing cost and in the process slowing economic activity. This is the environment we find ourselves in today with global central banks raising rates and tightening liquidity conditions.

Financial stocks thrive in a rising rates environment as banks and brokerage firms can charge higher interest on loans and earn higher income. Insurance firms' profit margin improves in this environment as insurers reinvest premium in long-term instruments like bonds, which earn higher interest income when rates are hiked. An analysis conducted by CI Global Asset Management showed that Canadian and US life insurers generated on average 19.36% and 27.27% return respectively during periods of interest rate hikes over the past twenty years.

Rising rates have also benefited real estate stocks such as REITs as interest rate hikes are led by robust growth and inflation which are positive for real estate prices. An analysis conducted by S&P Dow Jones research concluded that between 1970 and 2006, there were six periods with rising bond yields in the US, of which four saw US REITs produce positive total return. In two instances, REITs outperformed the S&P 500 index.

In 2021, several emerging market central banks including Bank of Russia, Banco Central do Brasil and the Hungarian National Bank among others raised their policy rate to combat inflation. Latin American central banks were among the most aggressive last year. Amidst rising rates, the LATAM sectors that produced positive returns on average were communication services, consumer staples, energy and materials. Communication services firms such as telecom as well as materials firms benefit from growth boom.

Political uncertainty: Numerous examples come to mind when contemplating the impact of political developments on equities. Taking a current example - the military standoff between Russia and Ukraine sent stocks crashing in Europe and US while also elevating commodity prices. Back in 2018, diminishing confidence in Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy's government sent Spanish and Italian stocks tumbling.

Amidst ever changing political dynamics, investors should pay attention to the sectors tied to these economic and political developments. Particularly during election period, having a quick read through candidates' election manifestos is a great tool to anticipate stock market winners and losers.

Catalyzed by the potential sanctions against Russia, oil, wheat, aluminium and palladium (key Russian exports) prices rallied. Markets fear a hit to the supply of these commodities if Western economies slap sanctions on Russia. Blue chip stocks, US treasuries, Japanese Yen (JPY) and Swiss Franc (CHF) tend to perform better in such scenarios, as they are considered safe haven, whereas companies and /or assets linked to sanctions or sanctioned entities underperform. Given the adverse supply shock on Russian natural gas, Dutch natural gas stocks rallied.

During the political uncertainty in Spain, market sentiments were tied to Spain's relations with the EU. Strong relations would signal policy continuity and boost investor sentiment. When PM Pedro Sanchez formed the government, the market rallied and bond yields fell given his commitment to standing by the Euro as well as follow sound government policies. In this case, the persona of the potential prime minister, signalled by his/her comments and election mandate determined market reaction.

Stock market investing can seem daunting. However, simple tools such as tracking the economic changes, reading through government budget documents and election manifestos go a long way in determining equity market winners and losers. You don't need a finance degree to grow your money. Just some good observation and daily reading.

RBI’s communication – Like Chinese Arithmetic

Monetary policymaking is not only about analyzing economic conditions and devising appropriate responses. It is equally if not more important for the central banker to correctly communicate the policies and their rationale in order to build investor confidence. Market participants closely watch and listen to monetary policy makers. They pay attention to the central bankers’ confidence or lack thereof while communicating. They try to unearth the hidden messages under each sentence spoken and what they imply for the market. The market’s verdict is immediate and most often it is unforgiving of gaffes and missteps.

In December 1996, then Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan asked a seemingly innocuous question during a banquet about irrational exuberance, escalating asset prices and appropriate policy action. Over the next few days, stock indices across Japan, Europe and US sold off. Or let’s recall a more recent incident involving ECB President Christine Lagarde. In March 2020 and in response to a journalist’s question, Lagarde rashly stated that “we are not here to close (sovereign debt) spreads”. Bond yields across European economies rose in reaction to this alarming statement.

Emerging market central banks are under even greater scrutiny given the lack of equivalent confidence in their institutions compared to developed markets. In this context, it is interesting to examine the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)’s communication with the market in recent years.

India entered the Covid-19 crisis on a relatively weak footing, with an elevated fiscal deficit, government debt and inflation. Foreign portfolio debt inflows had been declining since 2015 on the back of market concerns around deteriorating fiscal finances. With the government restricted in its actions, the RBI was responsible for much of the heavy lifting to steer the economy and market through this crisis. And while it did a good job of boosting systemic liquidity, offering credit guarantees to small businesses and suppressing bond yields, its communication was somewhat lacking.

This or that?

The RBI’s mandate is price stability while keeping in mind the objective of growth. In certain instances, the market was unsure about the RBI’s priority. For instance, in December 2019, the RBI decided to maintain the policy rate given high inflation. Simultaneously, it revised down its growth forecast to the lowest in over a decade. The market had been expecting further easing from the RBI, taking cues from its tone in the past meetings. Throughout 2019, the RBI had expressed concern over weakening industrial activity, service sector output and investment. Additionally, it had cut the policy rate by 135 basis points that year to support growth. The sudden switch to inflation control surprised the market as investor confidence building necessitates consistency of messaging.

The RBI is under a similar dilemma this year. CPI inflation exceeded its 2-6% target band in May and there are signs of further price pressures. RBI Governor Das brushed aside inflationary pressures in June by arguing that demand pull inflation is lacking. He reiterated the RBI’s accommodative monetary policy stance to revive and sustain growth. However, market participants continue to remain wary of the RBI’s next move. The money market is already pricing in 99 bp hike to the policy rate over the next year, indicating that the market does not buy the RBI’s commitment. The other aspect to note here is the lack of clarity over what the RBI is prioritizing. Is it growth or CPI inflation? This or that?

To be fair to the RBI, the Philippines central bank, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, is facing a similar quandary this year. Like the RBI, the BSP’s primary mandate is to maintain low and stable inflation within the 2-4% target range. Year to date, headline CPI inflation in the Philippines has averaged 4.5% y/y. Even though Q1 GDP contraction was worse than consensus expectation, the BSP maintained the policy rate. This rate hold was in line with market expectations given previous comments by BSP Governor on the appropriateness of policy setting and growth optimism. The messaging was consistent throughout.

The list of priorities is growing.

Since 2020, India has received massive foreign direct investment flows which boosted the capital account balance and strengthened the currency (please refer to my previous blog post on the relationship between capital account balance and currency). The RBI absorbed these capital inflows by building its FX reserves buffer and in the process controlled the Indian Rupee (INR)’s appreciation.

The RBI’s arguments were that currency appreciation hurts exports and lumpy capital inflows are vulnerable to reversal. It wanted to build a war chest of reserves to prevent currency weakness during periods of external risk-off. And again, to be fair to the RBI, it is haunted by the developments during the 2013 Taper Tantrum and 2018 Fed rate hike, when the INR sold off massively.

But there are flaws in the RBI’s logic and communication style. Currency weakness brings with it imported inflation, which an inflation targeting central bank is well aware of. Additionally, since 2019, Indian inflation has exceeded the RBI’s inflation targeting band.

Secondly, the RBI has not been clear about what magnitude of reserves are considered sufficient. India’s FX reserves have risen to a historical high of over USD 600 billion, the fifth largest globally. They are enough to cover anticipated capital outflows as well as almost 12 months of imports. Despite this robust cover, the RBI recently opined that reserves were insufficient in covering imports compared to Switzerland, Russia and China. Should the RBI be competing with other central banks or considering domestic needs? And like other good communicators, should it not clarify the parameters it is considering?

Finally, currency control appears to be an added priority on top of inflation targeting and growth support. This exacerbates the earlier point on the market’s confusion over RBI’s policy goals.

Will you be there when I need you the most?

The Covid-19 induced fiscal relief packages have weakened the Indian government’s fiscal profile. The government’s debt is estimated at 90% of GDP and it needs the RBI to control bond yields. The RBI stepped in nicely by buying government bonds in the secondary market and executing operation twist (buy long dated and sell short dated bonds to flatten the yield curve and ameliorate the government’s debt servicing needs).

For the most part, the RBI has been successful in suppressing yields. Moreover, its liquidity enhancing policies have massively cushioned the blow to the economy, particularly given the government's limited fiscal space. These have included credit lines and easier loan terms to consumers and SMEs, much needed financing to the struggling shadow banks and loan restructuring schemes to stressed segments.

What it has been less successful at is winning bond investors’ trust. At several points throughout 2020 and 2021, bond investors were unsure about whether the RBI will step in to keep yields low. Indian CPI inflation has been stubbornly high due to food prices and several rating agencies cut India’s sovereign rating and outlook. These factors necessitated higher bond yields and raised valid questions from bond investors.

The RBI has tended to step in when yields crossed a certain threshold, making its intervention reactive rather than proactive. Look at it this way, Mario Draghi’s comment “we will do whatever it takes to save the Euro”, singlehandedly calmed the market and prevented a sovereign debt crisis. This is the power of words and good communication personified.

The RBI has also been forced to cancel several bond auctions because the market was unwilling to accept low yields. The fundamentals were unsupportive and without the RBI’s explicit support, Indian bonds were not a comforting bet. Drawing parallels with other central banks, Bank Indonesia and BSP were more forthright in their government debt purchases. The BSP announced an arrangement with the Bureau of Treasury and secondary market purchase of government securities. The Indonesian government announced legal changes to allow primary market government debt purchase by BI and a burden sharing agreement as well. These were bold, unprecedented measures which were needed during unprecedented times. Although the market was concerned about institutional autonomy and exit strategy, it had the necessary information to forecast future policy actions. This was a major difference to the RBI.

All these arguments are not to belittle the quality of monetary policy in India or its makers. Rather, it is to point out the areas that still need improvement. Particularly since the adoption of inflation targeting, the investor community has been impressed with central banking in emerging Asia and the RBI is no exception. The RBI's efforts to clean up the non-performing debt in the banking system and its financial stability reports are well regarded and widely read by the investor community and policy analysts. Not to forget, the hugely important role that the RBI has played in steering the economy through this crisis.

It is precisely why the market has formed an expectation about the RBI’s monetary policy making. That it is good and well though out (most times). And when expectations are high, it doesn’t take much to lower them.